jibu swali hili

Harry Potter Swali

Im Confused! *Spoiler Alert*

If basilisk venom destroys horcruxes, then why didn't the bit of Voldemort in Harry die when he was stabbed with a basilisk fang?
 Face_of_Music posted zaidi ya mwaka mmoja uliopita
next question »

Harry Potter Majibu

boolander25 said:
i'm pretty sure its because fawkes healed harry before the horcrux had the chance to die
select as best answer
posted zaidi ya mwaka mmoja uliopita 
*
ok, thx!
Face_of_Music posted zaidi ya mwaka mmoja uliopita
*
actually it was before harry himself had a chance to die... see my response for explanation
lilylunapotter6 posted zaidi ya mwaka mmoja uliopita
dragonsmemory said:
The answer here is simple: Harry didn't die. Remember, a Horcrux casing has to be destroyed beyond all maggical repair to kill the bit of soul. In the case of a living Horcrux, death will do the trick, as no magic can reawaken the dead.
select as best answer
posted zaidi ya mwaka mmoja uliopita 
*
OH! thx hun! i never thought of that!
Face_of_Music posted zaidi ya mwaka mmoja uliopita
*
No problem
dragonsmemory posted zaidi ya mwaka mmoja uliopita
*
:D
Face_of_Music posted zaidi ya mwaka mmoja uliopita
*
Two reasons, and they are simple.
lilylunapotter6 posted zaidi ya mwaka mmoja uliopita
lilylunapotter6 said:
Two simple reasons.
One is that for Voldemort's soul piece to be forever destroyed, wewe had to "kill" the horcrux kwa destroying the object containing it. Harry did not "die", so nor did the soul part. Also, (spoiler alert; don't know if wewe have seen this movie sorry if wewe haven't) in DH 2, when Dumbledore says that Harry must die, he means it. But not necessarily. When Voldemort kills Harry in the Forbidden Forest with the Avada Kedavra spell, and wewe see that he is alive at King's kuvuka, msalaba with Dumbledore, wewe are like, "why isn't he dead?!" The answer is, he isn't dead because the spell didn't destroy him. It destroyed the soul piece inside of him. When Voldemort killed Lily Potter, the piece of his sould latched itself onto the first concealable living thing it could find-Harry himself, therefore making Harry the horcrux that Voldemort never meant to make, and he never knew it. when Voldy tries to kill Harry, he destroys the soul inside him instead. wewe see, when the trio destroys the objects in order to kill the soul parts inside them, they do not actually destroy the objects themselves-just the soul. For example, when they stabbed the cup, the cup stayed a cup-the cup itself was not destroyed, merely the soul piece. so if Harry didn't "die" (Fawkes healed him quickly), niether would the Horcrux, and that is what happened in CoS.
select as best answer
 Two simple reasons. One is that for Voldemort's soul piece to be forever destroyed, wewe had to "kill" the horcrux kwa destroying the object containing it. Harry did not "die", so nor did the soul part. Also, (spoiler alert; don't know if wewe have seen this movie sorry if wewe haven't) in DH 2, when Dumbledore says that Harry must die, he means it. But not necessarily. When Voldemort kills Harry in the Forbidden Forest with the Avada Kedavra spell, and wewe see that he is alive at King's kuvuka, msalaba with Dumbledore, wewe are like, "why isn't he dead?!" The answer is, he isn't dead because the spell didn't destroy him. It destroyed the soul piece inside of him. When Voldemort killed Lily Potter, the piece of his sould latched itself onto the first concealable living thing it could find-Harry himself, therefore making Harry the horcrux that Voldemort never meant to make, and he never knew it. when Voldy tries to kill Harry, he destroys the soul inside him instead. wewe see, when the trio destroys the objects in order to kill the soul parts inside them, they do not actually destroy the objects themselves-just the soul. For example, when they stabbed the cup, the cup stayed a cup-the cup itself was not destroyed, merely the soul piece. so if Harry didn't "die" (Fawkes healed him quickly), niether would the Horcrux, and that is what happened in CoS.
posted zaidi ya mwaka mmoja uliopita 
next question »