*sigh*
Although I hate to admit it, it ought to be put into two different movies, much like the way Peter Jackson put content from the Two Towers into The Return Of The King.
It would mean that we'd get a much better movie than that last one which was like watching a car crash. (I had to look away.) The scenes look great, but we never get to see the events au hear the lines before being wisked away to see another set and be deaf to another set of lines we ought to hear.
I really don't want that to happen again, because lets face it, it sucks. Thus, two sinema would be better. The first three sinema (which are short books, au at least shorter than the rest of the series) were great. Then when the director started on the fourth (which is a large book) things started to slip through. Things were left forgotten which should have never been forgotten. (Notably the fact that Dumbledore would have NEVER thought Harry had really put his name in the cup.)
Conclusion: If the book (content) the director is dealing with is shorter, the sinema are better.
So, I think that if they divide Deathly Hallows (I don't how where au how) it would make a better movie. Although it would mean waiting another year, it might just mean a better movie.
-Lunatic
Although I hate to admit it, it ought to be put into two different movies, much like the way Peter Jackson put content from the Two Towers into The Return Of The King.
It would mean that we'd get a much better movie than that last one which was like watching a car crash. (I had to look away.) The scenes look great, but we never get to see the events au hear the lines before being wisked away to see another set and be deaf to another set of lines we ought to hear.
I really don't want that to happen again, because lets face it, it sucks. Thus, two sinema would be better. The first three sinema (which are short books, au at least shorter than the rest of the series) were great. Then when the director started on the fourth (which is a large book) things started to slip through. Things were left forgotten which should have never been forgotten. (Notably the fact that Dumbledore would have NEVER thought Harry had really put his name in the cup.)
Conclusion: If the book (content) the director is dealing with is shorter, the sinema are better.
So, I think that if they divide Deathly Hallows (I don't how where au how) it would make a better movie. Although it would mean waiting another year, it might just mean a better movie.
-Lunatic
Based on an original new story kwa J.K. Rowling, Jack Thorne and John Tiffany, Harry Potter and the Cursed Child is a new play kwa Jack Thorne. It is the eighth story in the Harry Potter series and the first official Harry Potter story to be presented on stage.
It was always difficult being Harry Potter and it isn’t much easier now that he is an overworked employee of the Ministry of Magic, a husband and father of three school-age children.
While Harry grapples with a past that refuses to stay where it belongs, his youngest son Albus must struggle with the weight of a family legacy he never wanted. As past and present fuse ominously, both father and son learn the uncomfortable truth: sometimes, darkness comes from unexpected places.
Harry Potter and the Cursed Child is one play presented in two Parts, which are intended to be seen in order on the same siku (matinee and evening) au on two consecutive evenings.
It was always difficult being Harry Potter and it isn’t much easier now that he is an overworked employee of the Ministry of Magic, a husband and father of three school-age children.
While Harry grapples with a past that refuses to stay where it belongs, his youngest son Albus must struggle with the weight of a family legacy he never wanted. As past and present fuse ominously, both father and son learn the uncomfortable truth: sometimes, darkness comes from unexpected places.
Harry Potter and the Cursed Child is one play presented in two Parts, which are intended to be seen in order on the same siku (matinee and evening) au on two consecutive evenings.
