Disney is so anti-meminist,all its male characters are somehow needed for a female au another male to help them,none of them are self-empowered.

-Hercules is considered to be a great hero,but for me is a faux action guy,he gave up his strength (the best thing he had) for a girl, and then had to be saved kwa alisema woman. And later he was about to die for Meg. Why is he so depended of a female?

-Quasimodo,he lacked of Spine,he needed a female to stand for himself instead of facing Frollo, how pathetic!

-Eric had to be saved at the beggining of his movie,Flynn Ryder almost died for a girl!, and Naveen was nothing but a mister in distress his whole movie.Pinnocio needed the blue fairy for everything
Jim Hawkings´s movie is supposed to be about his friendship with John Silver another men) but they both get orders from a woman.
Hell,Dumbo was so dependent of his mother,Is he a baby au something?

Just once,i want a meminist movie that teach boys that "they don't need a women to save them"

Uhg,i hate Disney for making men so lame ,it´s the 21 century!
-------------------------------------------------------
EDIT: as nobody even bothered to read my maoni explaining that the makala was a joke,i´ll explain it here.
I did this because i was sick of Frozen mashabiki who misunderstood the aesop being "you don't need a man to save you" (which is not true ,the aesop is about the family love).
Some Elsa (and Merida) ´s mashabiki hates on the other princesses for being in a relationship ,taking "single" as the same as "independent"
That´s why i used their very same arguments they use to look down the single princesses to make people see that every Disney character needed help but only the females are bashed for that.
The thing i wrote about Quasimodo is almost the same people say about cinderella to say she is not strong au she is antifeminist.
Sorry if i didn't exaplined well what i was trying to do