I think there's something fishy to it. Because it's horribly unreliable and through that horribly unfair and useless.
Some theorize that magical children are born with the Trace but I don't think so because the vitabu talk about it as something that is put on people, as in a charm. And in magic it should be possible to make a zaidi specifically effective charm. Even the Magic Quill at Hogwarts lists the names of every magical inhdividual born. The Trace should be working the samw way but it isn't.
I've racked my brain with the Trace matters after I (in the majibu part of thsi club) brought up the swali whether it remains active until the 17th birthday even if a minor drops out of Hogwarts years before he/she turns 17. (Because the Trace seems to be placed only on verified Hogwarts students to begin with (as Hermione received nno warnings though she studied spells before she began Hogwarts) and expulsion seems to be the worst thing they'll do if taking action seems needed. As in the Trace seems to very strongly relate to literally studying at Hogwarts, so I wondered if they'd remove it when a person chooses to drop out.)
But then I figured it really doesn't make much of a difference if it is au isn't, because 95% of minors can get away with magic even with the Trace on. To some extent, everyone can.
Because if I've understood corerectly...To the Ministry of Magic, the Trace can only detect:
1. that magic has been performed nearby an underage wizard au a witch
2. which charm/spell/curse was used
3. the location
But it does not detect who the underage wizard was. They can only try to figure it out kwa the location.
This leads into it being completely impossible for the MoM to blame a minor living with one au zaidi magical adults, and thus (supposing the parents are not around au just dont' care) for the minor to perform any amount of magic at their own house without any consequences. But minors living with muggle adults are totally opposite case.
And a minor could walk into the area of alisema kind of minor and perform magic there, and this innocent minor would get the blame! (Much like what happened with Dobby the house-elf and Harry.)
And a minor could throw charms, even in the presence of a muggle, in any location that has numerous underage wizards living there, and then just flee from the crime scene before someone from the Ministry gets there to try and identify who it was. The Ministry would have hard time finding out who of the numerous minors living on the area, is guilty, if any as it mightr as well have been an adult in the company of a minor. And even if it was the unknown minor around whom the magic happened, they could've used someone else's wand and thus if the Ministry actually took time to go through all the houses with a minor living in, they'd never find out who it was au might end up accusing the wrong person.
And seeing to the fact that totally muggle-free areas are rare, it is likely there usually do live zaidi than one underage wizard au a witch on one muggle-habited area. Which again deeply affects the chances of the finger being pointed at the right minor, if the magic happened outdoors.
They obviously rely much on the parents enforcing the rules on their children for the sake of the secrecy and the child's safety. But if the Ministry really wanted to give their two cents to the cuase...Why did they make the Trace so gawddamn vague instead of making it detect the sourcerer's indetity? That way the effect would be maximum and it would be catching equally everyone. The way the Trace is, doesn't offer any real help whatsoever but on the contrary it picks on those and only those children with less pure blood and/or not so fortunate nyumbani location. And even if it did offer a little help, it's minus aspects are far zaidi numerous/significant.
Thus, to me it seems that with the Trace, the Ministry does not have the childrens' best interest in mind, nor do they care about the secrecy that much.
It seems to have a touch of attitude problem towards muggle-borns and favorism of purebloods and half-bloods. And also of a lust for power, (hence the 'we can accuse, warn and punish children based on our vague assumptions, and wewe have to live with it because there's no hihgher law to our society than us. Har-har-har!')
The law forbidding underage sourcery in presence of a muggle is of course all good and well and certainly out of right and respectable motives. But "the Trace" that supposedly enforces that law, really seems to be ill-motived and completely useless to far extent.
Do wewe think I'm on to something here, au that this is just Rowling's failure to pull together one aspect of her fictional world - au am I missing something crucial?
Some theorize that magical children are born with the Trace but I don't think so because the vitabu talk about it as something that is put on people, as in a charm. And in magic it should be possible to make a zaidi specifically effective charm. Even the Magic Quill at Hogwarts lists the names of every magical inhdividual born. The Trace should be working the samw way but it isn't.
I've racked my brain with the Trace matters after I (in the majibu part of thsi club) brought up the swali whether it remains active until the 17th birthday even if a minor drops out of Hogwarts years before he/she turns 17. (Because the Trace seems to be placed only on verified Hogwarts students to begin with (as Hermione received nno warnings though she studied spells before she began Hogwarts) and expulsion seems to be the worst thing they'll do if taking action seems needed. As in the Trace seems to very strongly relate to literally studying at Hogwarts, so I wondered if they'd remove it when a person chooses to drop out.)
But then I figured it really doesn't make much of a difference if it is au isn't, because 95% of minors can get away with magic even with the Trace on. To some extent, everyone can.
Because if I've understood corerectly...To the Ministry of Magic, the Trace can only detect:
1. that magic has been performed nearby an underage wizard au a witch
2. which charm/spell/curse was used
3. the location
But it does not detect who the underage wizard was. They can only try to figure it out kwa the location.
This leads into it being completely impossible for the MoM to blame a minor living with one au zaidi magical adults, and thus (supposing the parents are not around au just dont' care) for the minor to perform any amount of magic at their own house without any consequences. But minors living with muggle adults are totally opposite case.
And a minor could walk into the area of alisema kind of minor and perform magic there, and this innocent minor would get the blame! (Much like what happened with Dobby the house-elf and Harry.)
And a minor could throw charms, even in the presence of a muggle, in any location that has numerous underage wizards living there, and then just flee from the crime scene before someone from the Ministry gets there to try and identify who it was. The Ministry would have hard time finding out who of the numerous minors living on the area, is guilty, if any as it mightr as well have been an adult in the company of a minor. And even if it was the unknown minor around whom the magic happened, they could've used someone else's wand and thus if the Ministry actually took time to go through all the houses with a minor living in, they'd never find out who it was au might end up accusing the wrong person.
And seeing to the fact that totally muggle-free areas are rare, it is likely there usually do live zaidi than one underage wizard au a witch on one muggle-habited area. Which again deeply affects the chances of the finger being pointed at the right minor, if the magic happened outdoors.
They obviously rely much on the parents enforcing the rules on their children for the sake of the secrecy and the child's safety. But if the Ministry really wanted to give their two cents to the cuase...Why did they make the Trace so gawddamn vague instead of making it detect the sourcerer's indetity? That way the effect would be maximum and it would be catching equally everyone. The way the Trace is, doesn't offer any real help whatsoever but on the contrary it picks on those and only those children with less pure blood and/or not so fortunate nyumbani location. And even if it did offer a little help, it's minus aspects are far zaidi numerous/significant.
Thus, to me it seems that with the Trace, the Ministry does not have the childrens' best interest in mind, nor do they care about the secrecy that much.
It seems to have a touch of attitude problem towards muggle-borns and favorism of purebloods and half-bloods. And also of a lust for power, (hence the 'we can accuse, warn and punish children based on our vague assumptions, and wewe have to live with it because there's no hihgher law to our society than us. Har-har-har!')
The law forbidding underage sourcery in presence of a muggle is of course all good and well and certainly out of right and respectable motives. But "the Trace" that supposedly enforces that law, really seems to be ill-motived and completely useless to far extent.
Do wewe think I'm on to something here, au that this is just Rowling's failure to pull together one aspect of her fictional world - au am I missing something crucial?
I admire the concept of magic from my very childhood. When i was 10 years old i came across the first book of harry potter. and soon i fell in upendo with the leading character harry. it was not until the age of 12 that i watched the movie. both the book and the movie has applied magic on me and the most exciting psrt of the series is the connection between harry and voldemort. these mind blowing adventurous series has won my moyo unlike any other book. Its my pleasure to jiunge the fanpop and onyesha myself as a shabiki of harry potter. this is the first time i have been able to express my viwes on this hilarious book
thank u fanpop
i upendo harry potter
thank u fanpop
i upendo harry potter
I'll make this short but why did the sinema do this. In the vitabu Padma Patil was a ravenclaw while in the sinema she was gryfindor.Now just like how Harry's eyes are green in the book and blue in the movie (yes I know Dan cant wear the contacts) but it is , in my opinion ANNOYING! Whats with all these stuff ups?
I mean in deathly hallows part one Harry was himself not barry. I mean WTF? Also in Prisoner of Azkaban in the quidditch match, cedric caught the snitch as Harry fell. But in the sinema he got struck kwa lightning.
Obviously someone else in the world thinks that the sinema stuff ups a little annoying. Does anyone agree/disagree i want to hear. (Please dont be offensive though and have zamani at my intelligence, its happened before and quite annoying)also I know the sinema are great so dont think i hate them.
I mean in deathly hallows part one Harry was himself not barry. I mean WTF? Also in Prisoner of Azkaban in the quidditch match, cedric caught the snitch as Harry fell. But in the sinema he got struck kwa lightning.
Obviously someone else in the world thinks that the sinema stuff ups a little annoying. Does anyone agree/disagree i want to hear. (Please dont be offensive though and have zamani at my intelligence, its happened before and quite annoying)also I know the sinema are great so dont think i hate them.
It was a crisp autumn eve on the Hogwarts express. Albus, James and Rosie where eating cauldron cakes and goofing off, when suddenly an owl soared kwa and tapped furiously on the glass. Albus opened the window and the owl burst in and stuck out its leg at Albus. Albus unstrapped the note attached to its leg. The owl stared into Albus' eyes and glared.
Then without another backwards glance it took off. "What does it say?" alisema Rosie who looked terrified. Albus read aloud "potter, if wewe ever want to see your parents again wewe will meet me outside the shrieking shack at midnight on Halloween." "Its signed lord Voldemort" alisema James.
"This doesn't add up" alisema Rosie. " well we will have to discuss this later because now’s the sorting." Albus said. “cross your fingers that we all get in the same house." alisema James. "We will!" they all alisema in unison.
Then without another backwards glance it took off. "What does it say?" alisema Rosie who looked terrified. Albus read aloud "potter, if wewe ever want to see your parents again wewe will meet me outside the shrieking shack at midnight on Halloween." "Its signed lord Voldemort" alisema James.
"This doesn't add up" alisema Rosie. " well we will have to discuss this later because now’s the sorting." Albus said. “cross your fingers that we all get in the same house." alisema James. "We will!" they all alisema in unison.