jibu swali hili

bila mpangilio Swali

Theories that wewe find stupid

They can be your inayopendelewa game/movie/TV show/celebrity/etc.
 DisneyPrince88 posted zaidi ya mwaka mmoja uliopita
next question »

bila mpangilio Majibu

Sparklefairy375 said:
A Disney shabiki theory about how Frozen/Tangled/Little Mermaid/Tarzan are all connected. Doesn't makes sense for me as those sinema are set in different place and time. What makes this theory sounds even zaidi stupid is just because easter eggs that they onyesha in Frozen?? Come on, easter eggs just means nothing.

If wewe watch all of those sinema you'll find out why this theory is really stupid.
select as best answer
 A Disney shabiki theory about how Frozen/Tangled/Little Mermaid/Tarzan are all connected. Doesn't makes sense for me as those sinema are set in different place and time. What makes this theory sounds even zaidi stupid is just because easter eggs that they onyesha in Frozen?? Come on, easter eggs just means nothing. If wewe watch all of those sinema you'll find out why this theory is really stupid.
posted zaidi ya mwaka mmoja uliopita 
*
I find this theory really stupid as well.
SilentForce posted zaidi ya mwaka mmoja uliopita
*
I hate those too. Kind of one of the things I listed ish
8theGreat posted zaidi ya mwaka mmoja uliopita
*
I find it interesting as too see a way all the easter eggs could connect but not really to be taken seriously as a theory.
Riku114 posted zaidi ya mwaka mmoja uliopita
zanhar1 said:
Literally any theory wewe learn in math class.

Those "character x is not gay" when the character clearly is au "character x is a transwoman" when the character is alisema kwa the creators to not be. Basically theories that completely contradict the show's canon context.
AU's and headcanons are fine; just don't push them on people and pretend like they're true. I've written Azula/Sokka fanfics but I'm not trying to pretend like Sokkla is canon.
select as best answer
posted zaidi ya mwaka mmoja uliopita 
*
Yeah, I agree about the theories that contradict the canon.
cruella posted zaidi ya mwaka mmoja uliopita
ShadowFan100 said:
This theory that states that all the rugrat babies are figments of Angelica's imagination. I mean, there MIGHT be some credibility to this...

But idk.
select as best answer
 This theory that states that all the rugrat babies are figments of Angelica's imagination. I mean, there MIGHT be some credibility to this... But idk.
posted zaidi ya mwaka mmoja uliopita 
*
I also remember a theory that Angelica's doll Cynthia was supposed to represent her mother who was an addict who died from heroine overdose.
SilentForce posted zaidi ya mwaka mmoja uliopita
*
Honestly,I think that the only reason why people come up with this theories is because now that they are adults they think that its a cool thing to view their inayopendelewa childhood shows in a much zaidi darker and twisted way.
SilentForce posted zaidi ya mwaka mmoja uliopita
*
U mean Angelica's mom izn't a crak hed????
zanhar1 posted zaidi ya mwaka mmoja uliopita
cruella said:
Any theory where adult mashabiki try to bring sexual content into children’s media(ex. Scrooge and Goldie had sex in the cabin, au Beast sexual abused Belle). I especially hate when they demand that it’s fact.

Another one that I think is really dumb is the, Jar Jar Binks is secretly a Sith Lord, theory.
select as best answer
posted zaidi ya mwaka mmoja uliopita 
*
People actually believe that the Beast sexually abused Belle?Facepalm
SilentForce posted zaidi ya mwaka mmoja uliopita
*
Yeah there are. Why they think Disney would make a movie where the hero rapes the heroine, I have no idea. 😒
cruella posted zaidi ya mwaka mmoja uliopita
*
^^ ^ Yup I don’t know where they came up with it, considering there are NO hints to it.
cruella posted zaidi ya mwaka mmoja uliopita
8theGreat said:
Literally any fucking shabiki theory that's like "[Main character] is in a coma. None of this is real. It's all imaginary." Overused. Lazy.
It was cool to think about like the first two times but it needs to stop now.



au any really contrived "These two things take place in the same universe" au those like Pixar timeline things that are really forced and based on conveniences.

I swear it's like watching conspiracy theory channels talking about the Illuminati and like Jeb kichaka can't melt chem trails au whatever.
select as best answer
 Literally any fucking shabiki theory that's like "[Main character] is in a coma. None of this is real. It's all imaginary." Overused. Lazy. It was cool to think about like the first two times but it needs to stop now. au any really contrived "These two things take place in the same universe" au those like Pixar timeline things that are really forced and based on conveniences. I swear it's like watching conspiracy theory channels talking about the Illuminati and like Jeb kichaka can't melt chem trails au whatever.
posted zaidi ya mwaka mmoja uliopita 
*
Agreed.The"everything that happened was just part of the main character's imagination"is really stupid and overused especially on Creepypasta.
SilentForce posted zaidi ya mwaka mmoja uliopita
*
I agree. I hate both of those kind of theories.
cruella posted zaidi ya mwaka mmoja uliopita
AquaMarine6663 said:
Pretty much any coma au "it's not real" theory, like the Adventure Time theory that Finn is in a coma and the land of Ooo is just in his mind, au that Ash Ketchum is in a coma and Pokemon isn't real.
And then there's the whole theories that say character A is actually character B from an entirely different onyesha made kwa entirely different studios and people. Just stop, they're stupid.
select as best answer
posted zaidi ya mwaka mmoja uliopita 
next question »